Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01492
Original file (BC 2014 01492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01492

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect 9968 Marlin 
Drive, Dallas, Texas 75228.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The HOR reflected on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United 
States Report of Transfer or Discharge, was his father’s 
address, not his address.  

In support of his request, the applicant provides his DD Form 
214, Special Order AB-8705, Assignment, AF Form 973, Request and 
Authorization for Change of Administrative Orders, and AF Form 
100, Request and Authorization for Separation, showing where he 
entered the Air Force. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 30 Jun 
69.

The applicant’s DD Form 4, Enlistment Contract Armed Forces of 
the United States, reflects Texarkana, Arkansas as HOR.

On 3 Jan 76, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, 
and was credited with 6 years, 6 months, and 4 days of active 
service.   

The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects 1205 Jackson Street, 
Texarkana, Arkansas as his HOR.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The Joint Federal Travel Regulation 
(JFTR), Volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1 states, “The place 
recorded as the home of record of the individual when 
reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that 
recorded when commission, appointed, enlisted or inducted, or 
ordered into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in 
service of more than one full day.  Only if a break in service 
exceeds one full day, may the member change the HOR.”  AFPC 
Enlisted Accessions Branch confirmed that the applicant 
initialed his DD Form 4 on 30 Jun 69, as well as subsequent 
enlistment documents listing Texarkana, Arkansas as his HOR.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 29 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01492 in Executive Session on 13 Jan 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 7 May 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Sep 14.

						





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04047

    Original file (BC 2014 04047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04047 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home or Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect North Carolina on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02696

    Original file (BC 2014 02696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. They confirmed that the applicant initialed his DD Form 4, dated 13 Sep 05, which lists Largo, Florida as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01621

    Original file (BC 2013 01621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The time reflected in block 11 (Primary Specialty) of her DD Form 214 of 5 years and 10 months should be the same as the time (6 years) in block 12 (Record of Service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01593

    Original file (BC 2014 01593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01593 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Place of Enlistment (POE) and Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Desoto, Texas 75115. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00062

    Original file (BC 2014 00062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Texas has been her legal permanent home state since 1964. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01266

    Original file (BC 2014 01266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01266 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Columbus Ohio. In support of her request, she submits a letter of selection for the United States Air Force, dated 27 Jun 72 and an AF Form 941, Statement of Understanding (Delayed Enlistment Program) signed 18 Sep 72; which identifies Columbus Ohio as the place...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04246

    Original file (BC 2014 04246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04246 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home or Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect San Antonio, Texas on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. According to the AF Form 768, Extended Active Duty Order, the applicant commissioned with the Regular Air Force on 14 Aug 04. The applicant’s military personnel record was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04871

    Original file (BC 2013 04871.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04871 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Washington, Missouri, to Las Vegas, Nevada. According to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his HOR at time of entry is reflected as “Washington (Franklin) MO.” The remaining...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00522

    Original file (BC 2013 00522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After reviewing the documentation presented and the applicant’s military personnel record, there is no evidence to warrant changing the applicant’s HOR. The applicant argues that his home of record (HOR), as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02416

    Original file (BC 2014 02416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is no error or injustice that would justify a change in the applicant’s HOR. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...